Epson C12XL vs Shibaura Machine TV800: Robot Comparison
Updated: 6 hours ago
IN A NUTSHELL
🔎 THE KEY DIFFERENCE Epson C12XL has the higher stated load capacity and longer stated reach. Those figures help shortlist it for heavier loads or wider layouts, but do not prove a faster production cycle. |
→ CONSIDER Epson C12XL Consider it when additional load capacity and reach matter. This article compares 12 kg and a 1,400 mm stated reach; include the gripper and part in the load. |
→ CONSIDER Shibaura Machine TV800 Consider it when its stated load and reach already cover your task and its controls fit your equipment. This article compares 5 kg and a 892 mm stated reach; include the gripper and part in the load. |
💡 THE TAKEAWAY For repetitive pick-and-place or assembly, check the actual vertical stroke and tool rotation as well as horizontal reach. Compare the same loaded cycle and installed quotation before deciding. |
Epson C12XL vs Shibaura Machine TV800 is a choice about assembly and machine tending. Epson C12XL and Shibaura Machine TV800 differ in their working envelope, loading assumptions and engineering ecosystem. A useful decision starts with the exact mechanism and process, then checks whether either robot can execute the required path with the real tool attached. This comparison separates documented specifications from application-level engineering judgments.
Epson C12XL vs Shibaura Machine TV800: quick verdict
Shortlist Epson C12XL for 12 kg industrial handling within the documented 1400 mm working reference. Shortlist Shibaura Machine TV800 for 5 kg industrial handling within the documented 892 mm working reference. Neither is a universal winner: a robot that can carry the load may still fail the fixture-access, controller or maintenance requirements.
The numerical comparison below uses Epson C12XL against Shibaura Machine TV800. The stated model scope matters when comparing later revisions or differently equipped installations. Published repeatability describes return to a taught position under specified conditions; it does not establish complete-cell accuracy or prove a faster production cycle.
Specifications and exact configuration scope
Criterion | Epson C12XL | Shibaura Machine TV800 |
|---|---|---|
Comparison configuration | Epson C12XL | Shibaura Machine TV800 |
Payload used for comparison | 12 kg | 5 kg (maximum reference; subject to load chart) |
Reach / motion-area reference | 1400 mm | 892 mm |
Axes | 6 | 6 |
Repeatability for this scope | ±0.050 mm | ±0.02 mm |
Controller reference | Epson RC700-A | TS3100 / TS3100E |
Purchase-price basis | Configuration-specific quotation | Configuration-specific quotation |
Purchase pricing | Request a configuration-specific quote | Request a configuration-specific quote |
Read the reach row together with the geometric notes below. Manufacturers may specify an arm-link sum, a wrist-centre motion area or reach to the flange; those dimensions are not interchangeable. The table does not establish access to every point at every tool angle. Controller references identify reviewed packages, and actual compatibility must be confirmed by model, software version and region.
Epson C12XL: design and configuration
The reviewed C12XL is the long 1400 mm, 12 kg six-axis Epson configuration with ±0.050 mm repeatability. The long arm is relevant to wider machine-loading and packaging cells, but the added elbow sweep and extended wrist loading must be included in the simulation. The reviewed RC700-A controller, floor/tabletop mounting scope and exact protection option should be specified. C12XL, shorter C12 configurations and newer C12-B revisions are separate order identities; payload, reach and precision must not be blended across them. Nominal catalogue cycle time does not establish the loaded production sequence.
Shibaura Machine TV800: design and configuration
Shibaura Machine TV800 is compared using the TV800 reference with 5 kg maximum load, 892 mm flange reach and ±0.02 mm repeatability. The 800 mm arm length and 892 mm maximum reach are different geometric measurements. Cleanroom and waterproof -IP packages are separate versions. The manufacturer separately specifies a 2 kg rated load and the matched TS3100 / TS3100E controller. Six axes support tool attitude control that a SCARA wrist cannot provide, but they add joint-limit, singularity and recovery-path checks. Validate complete gripper mass, wrist moments, inertia and base reactions. The maximum-load reference used for arithmetic is not approval of an offset payload or continuous high-acceleration operation. Repeatability is specified for one-direction motion under stable thermal conditions; it is not absolute accuracy or guaranteed trajectory error. Standard-cycle demonstrations do not establish the loaded cycle time of another application. Specify cable routing, pneumatic services and any IP option in the quotation rather than assuming the family illustration includes them.
For this pair, Shibaura Machine TV800 offers 5 kg over the stated 892 mm reference, compared with 12 kg and 1400 mm for Epson C12XL example. Epson C12XL has the larger stated distance by 508 mm, but this difference is only a preliminary layout indicator because reference points and joint envelopes can differ. Locate the actual fixture in each manufacturer model before treating this as usable extra working space.
Payload, tooling and a worked load example
Consider an illustrative total wrist load of 4 kg: a 1 kg tool and adapter package carrying a 3 kg part or product group. This arithmetic leaves 8 kg below the Epson C12XL example’s nominal limit and 1 kg below Shibaura Machine TV800’s nominal limit. These are mass differences, not safety factors or a validated load approval. A heavy camera, valve block or retained material must be included before recalculating the total.
The example exposes the practical question: is the application limited by mass, by tool offset or by wrist rotation? Shibaura Machine TV800 is the lower-or-equal nominal payload choice in this pair. Epson C12XL offers more or equal headline mass capacity, but that alone cannot approve an eccentric fixture. Moving the same mass farther from the flange increases the moment, and spreading it increases rotational inertia. Manufacturer load diagrams and the actual centre of gravity govern the final allowable motion.
Model the empty, partly loaded and fully loaded tool states separately. A vacuum layer gripper, a weld torch with hoses or an inspection head may change its effective loading during the cycle. Set the controller’s load data for each supported state and validate the transition logic. A payload table cannot predict acceleration derating, cable pull or transient reactions at a machine interface.
Reach, orientation and fixture access
Build the same cell model for both candidates: base height, machine opening, fixture datum, maximum part size, tool extension and access for maintenance. Epson C12XL provides a stated 1400 mm reference, while Shibaura Machine TV800 provides 892 mm. Check the deepest production pose and the return path with the loaded tool. An arm that just touches the target at full extension may have little freedom left to turn, retract or avoid a door.
For assembly and machine tending, test the gripper jaws in their open and closed positions. Include feeder replenishment, rejected-part disposal and tool changes. Check wrist flips and singularity avoidance along the whole path. A compact robot can fit a small fixture well, while a longer arm can simplify station placement; neither geometric benefit can be assumed without the actual model.
Precision and throughput: compare the same task
The comparison uses ±0.050 mm for Epson C12XL and ±0.02 mm for Shibaura Machine TV800. These figures should be read in their documented configuration scope. Repeatability is not absolute accuracy, camera calibration accuracy or finished-part capability. Fixture variation, TCP calibration, thermal conditions and tool compliance can dominate the error at the process point, especially when the tool extends far from the flange.
Ask each integrator to execute the same representative path with the same payload model, tool length, process dwell and stop conditions. Report transfer time, settling time, process time and waiting time separately. Published standard cycles often use different loads and distances; dividing one catalogue cycle by another would not establish the production advantage of Epson C12XL over Shibaura Machine TV800. Use a measured or validated application cycle before assigning a throughput benefit.
Programming, controls and production integration
Epson C12XL is paired here with Epson RC700-A, while Shibaura Machine TV800 uses TS3100 / TS3100E. Controller names identify the review baseline rather than a guarantee that all interface options are included. Compare the actual software revision, teaching workflow, diagnostic tools, fieldbus licences and recovery procedures. An existing trained team and reusable production code may outweigh a small dimensional advantage. Obtain a demonstration of the same machine handshake and interrupted-cycle recovery on both platforms.
Specify the PLC handshakes before ordering: cycle request, ready, busy, complete, fault, part present and recovery authorization. Define how an interrupted operation resumes without repeating a dangerous or quality-critical action. Vision, force sensing, fieldbus communication and external-axis coordination must be checked as explicit included or optional functions. An Ethernet connector does not by itself prove that a particular industrial protocol or software interface is licensed and supported.
Configuration and communication detail
Integration reference | Epson C12XL | Shibaura Machine TV800 |
|---|---|---|
Control package | Epson RC700-A | TS3100 / TS3100E |
Documented interface baseline | Specify required interfaces in the delivered package | Specify required interfaces in the delivered package |
Programming baseline | Named platform software and supported API; confirm supplied version | Named platform software and supported API; confirm supplied version |
Integration acceptance | Test the actual machine handshake and controlled recovery | Test the same handshake and controlled recovery |
Protection, installation and maintenance
Match the precise protection package to the process. Standard, protected, cleanroom, foundry and washing configurations can have different seals, services and maintenance requirements. Do not transfer the best optional IP or cleanroom rating to an unprotected base model. Check the controller location, cable bend radius, available lifting access and base reactions with the installer.
Treat safe operation as a property of the complete task and installation. Include the tool, sharp workpiece edges, trapping points, dropped loads and machine access. These robot systems require task-specific safeguarding; payload or compact size does not establish safe unguarded operation. Plan tool replacement and fault recovery without dismantling the whole installation, and include connector access, lubrication and spare-cable replacement in the maintenance layout.
Price and lifecycle value
Request configuration-specific quotations for Epson C12XL and Shibaura Machine TV800. An arm-only number is not the price of a commissioned production cell. Ask for separate line items for controller, pendant, communication options, end effector, safety equipment, installation, acceptance, training and warranty. Price changes, regional support and included software can reverse an apparent hardware-cost advantage. Compare the same delivered scope before calculating payback.
Compare the installed production scope: tool, fixtures, sensing, guarding, machine interface, programming, acceptance and training. For small-parts automation, include feeders, vision calibration, nests and rejected-part handling. Keep purchase cost and recurring support costs separate. No payback figure is defensible until the actual cycle, yield, utilization and installation quotation are known.
Selection and acceptance plan
Decision gate | Epson C12XL | Shibaura Machine TV800 |
|---|---|---|
Strongest documented fit | 12 kg industrial handling within the documented 1400 mm working reference | 5 kg industrial handling within the documented 892 mm working reference |
Main boundary | Tool mass, wrist moments and access constrain the headline specification. | Confirm exact configuration, controller, wrist loading and installation envelope. |
Required approval | Exact Epson variant, tool load and validated process path | Exact competitor revision, tool load and validated process path |
Acceptance evidence | Agreed parts, path, quality and recovery results | The same agreed parts, path, quality and recovery results |
Advance Epson C12XL when 12 kg industrial handling within the documented 1400 mm working reference solves the real constraint and its selected configuration passes the load and access checks. Advance Shibaura Machine TV800 when 5 kg industrial handling within the documented 892 mm working reference provides the more suitable process arrangement. Reject either candidate if a mandatory pose, protection requirement or controller function cannot be demonstrated. A purchasing shortlist should preserve these conditions instead of converting a single catalogue advantage into a blanket recommendation.
Before acceptance, agree the representative parts, tool states, operating sequence and quality criteria with both suppliers. Demonstrate cold start, normal production, rejected parts, interrupted cycles and controlled recovery. Record the final tool data and software backup. This turns the comparison into a repeatable purchasing decision and helps prevent a later fixture change from invalidating the original robot selection.
Motion architecture and functionality
Epson C12XL has 6 arm axes and Shibaura Machine TV800 has 6 arm axes. Both have six arm axes; equal axis counts do not establish equal joint travel, inner workspace or fixture access. Compare tool detection, sensing, machine I/O and recovery as separate delivered functions.
Industries and application fit
For Epson C12XL vs Shibaura Machine TV800, use the actual part and process as the industry filter. Electronics, manufactured-component handling and machine tending are candidate uses when their tool mass, access and quality requirements fit the documented configurations. These are application-selection judgments, not claims that either exact model is installed at a named customer. A food, medical-device or clean-production application additionally requires the correct material, lubrication and protection package; the base model name does not establish hygienic or cleanroom compliance.
Selection issue | Epson C12XL | Shibaura Machine TV800 |
|---|---|---|
Tool and workpiece mass | 12 kg named scope; include the complete tool | 5 kg named scope; include the complete tool |
Working reference | 1400 mm | 892 mm |
Main configuration boundary | Tool mass, wrist moments and access constrain the headline specification. | Confirm exact configuration, controller, wrist loading and installation envelope. |
Process approval | Demonstrate the actual loaded path and recovery | Demonstrate the same loaded path and recovery |
Frequently asked questions
Which robot is better for this application?
Epson C12XL is the stronger starting point for 12 kg industrial handling within the documented 1400 mm working reference, while Shibaura Machine TV800 is worth shortlisting for 5 kg industrial handling within the documented 892 mm working reference. The final choice depends on the real loaded path, required protection, controls and acceptance results. Neither a higher payload nor a longer reach establishes a universal winner.
What payload should I use for the comparison?
Use 12 kg for the specified Epson C12XL example and 5 kg for Shibaura Machine TV800, subject to all documented load and orientation conditions. Include the tool, adapters, sensors and carried part. Confirm exact configuration, controller, wrist loading and installation envelope.
Does the stated reach guarantee access to my fixture?
No. The comparison gives 1400 mm for Epson C12XL and 892 mm for Shibaura Machine TV800 using the stated model references. Joint limits, reach reference points, wrist orientation, tool length and collisions determine whether the actual fixture is accessible. Simulate the full approach and exit path.
Can I use the best specifications from every family variant?
No. Keep each named model and revision intact. A different arm length, controller generation or protection option can change the relevant specification. Do not combine one version’s maximum payload with another version’s maximum reach.
Is repeatability the same as finished-part accuracy?
No. The stated values are ±0.050 mm for Epson C12XL scope and ±0.02 mm for the competitor scope. Finished-part results also depend on fixtures, TCP calibration, sensing, thermal conditions and tool compliance. Validate the actual process instead of treating catalogue repeatability as a complete accuracy guarantee.
How should purchase prices be compared?
Use current written quotations for Epson C12XL and Shibaura Machine TV800 with the same arm, controller, software, tooling and commissioning scope. This comparison does not represent an ATC sales offer or stock confirmation. Historical review figures are not a substitute for a configuration-specific purchase quotation.
Can these robots operate safely next to people without guarding?
These specifications do not establish a safe unguarded installation. Assess the complete task, tool, load and machine interface, then implement and validate the required safeguarding and operating procedures. Do not infer collaborative operation from a compact arm, limited payload or education setting.
What should an acceptance test compare?
Use the same parts, actual tool load, fixture locations, path and quality criteria for Epson C12XL and Shibaura Machine TV800. Check production timing, settling, interruptions and recovery. Include the most difficult loaded approach and retreat. Approve the exact delivered configuration and preserve its final settings.
Related ATC reviews
Specifications describe the model scope identified above. Purchase pricing requires a current configuration-specific quotation. Confirm current manufacturer documentation, local supply, controller compatibility and the exact configuration before purchase.
