ABB IRB 910SC vs Mitsubishi Electric RH-3FHR: Robot Comparison

IN A NUTSHELL

ABB IRB 910SC vs Mitsubishi Electric RH-3FHR is a choice about SCARA assembly and planar handling. ABB IRB 910SC 6 kg / 650 mm and Mitsubishi Electric RH-3FHR3515-D differ in their working envelope, loading assumptions and engineering ecosystem. A useful decision starts with the exact mechanism and process, then checks whether either robot can execute the required path with the real tool attached. This comparison separates documented specifications from application-level engineering judgments.

ABB IRB 910SC vs Mitsubishi Electric RH-3FHR: quick verdict

Shortlist ABB IRB 910SC for 6 kg planar handling within the selected 650 mm SCARA envelope. Shortlist Mitsubishi Electric RH-3FHR for 3 kg planar handling within the selected 350 mm SCARA envelope. Both are four-axis SCARA candidates, so the decisive questions are planar access, vertical stroke, spindle inertia and the complete assembly cycle. Neither supplies independent tool pitch and roll.

The numerical comparison below uses ABB IRB 910SC 6 kg / 650 mm against Mitsubishi Electric RH-3FHR3515-D. The ABB configuration is a worked example chosen from documented family combinations, not a claim that every family member has those specifications. Other variants can change the conclusion. Published repeatability describes return to a taught position under specified conditions; it does not establish complete-cell accuracy or prove a faster production cycle.

Specifications and exact configuration scope

Read the reach row together with the geometric notes below. Manufacturers may specify an arm-link sum, a wrist-centre motion area or reach to the flange; those dimensions are not interchangeable. The table does not establish access to every point at every tool angle. Controller references identify reviewed packages, and actual compatibility must be confirmed by model, software version and region.

ABB IRB 910SC: design and configuration

The IRB 910SC is a four-axis SCARA family with 450, 550 and 650 mm arm lengths, a 3 kg rated payload and 6 kg maximum. Horizontal, vertical and spindle repeatability are separate. The comparison uses a named arm-length example and the maximum load only as a load limit, rather than assuming the maximum load produces the catalogue cycle time.

The selected example is ABB IRB 910SC 6 kg / 650 mm. Standard and internally dressed versions must not be blended into one specification. Obtain a load diagram and current technical sheet for the actual order code, including any reduced payload or different protection package. A family starting price is not a quotation for the chosen variant.

Mitsubishi Electric RH-3FHR: design and configuration

Mitsubishi Electric RH-3FHR is compared at 3 kg and 350 mm in the exact selected configuration. The mechanical reference is RH-3FHR3515-D: four arm axes, 150 mm vertical stroke and ±0.01 mm XY repeatability. This is the ceiling-mounted FHR arrangement at 350 mm, not a floor-mounted RH-3FH. Its standard 150 mm Z stroke differs from the 120 mm protected/clean builds. The overhead support, base reactions, cable service loop and access below the robot are part of the actual cell design. The catalogue distinguishes the 3 kg maximum wrist load from a 1 kg rated reference; maximum loading must not be used as the test load for a short standard-cycle claim. XY positional repeatability, Z repeatability and angular spindle repeatability are separate quantities with different units. A four-axis SCARA positions and rotates a level tool; it does not independently supply arbitrary wrist pitch and roll. Check spindle inertia, tool offset, vertical process forces, clearances at both ends of the Z travel and the actual loaded transfer. Match the CR750/CR751 F-generation arm/controller order code, software, safety options and delivered I/O rather than substituting a newer FR/CR800 package. Standard, oil-mist, waterproof and cleanroom builds are different specifications. Environmental options can change stroke, bellows clearance and installation requirements; cleanliness also depends on the manufacturer’s airflow/suction conditions. A published cycle benchmark does not establish a loaded production cycle, insertion accuracy or uptime. Include every tool, adapter, sensor, retained part and service line in the dynamic load model, then demonstrate the process and a safe recovery after a stop. An overhead installation requires an approved support and maintenance procedure; it must not inherit floor-mount assumptions. Confirm the quoted generation, condition, spare-part support, regional service and actual price. Legacy documentation establishes technical identity without guaranteeing current local stock.

For this pair, Mitsubishi Electric RH-3FHR offers 3 kg over the stated 350 mm reference, compared with 6 kg and 650 mm for ABB IRB 910SC example. ABB IRB 910SC has the larger stated distance by 300 mm, but this difference is only a preliminary layout indicator because reference points and joint envelopes can differ. Locate the actual fixture in each manufacturer model before treating this as usable extra working space.

Payload, tooling and a worked load example

Consider an illustrative total wrist load of 2.4 kg: a 0.6 kg tool and adapter package carrying a 1.8 kg part or product group. This arithmetic leaves 3.6 kg below the ABB IRB 910SC example’s nominal limit and 0.6 kg below Mitsubishi Electric RH-3FHR’s nominal limit. These are mass differences, not safety factors or a validated load approval. A heavy camera, valve block or retained material must be included before recalculating the total.

The example exposes the practical question: is the application limited by mass, by tool offset or by wrist rotation? Mitsubishi Electric RH-3FHR is the lower-or-equal nominal payload choice in this pair. ABB IRB 910SC offers more or equal headline mass capacity, but that alone cannot approve an eccentric fixture. Moving the same mass farther from the flange increases the moment, and spreading it increases rotational inertia. Manufacturer load diagrams and the actual centre of gravity govern the final allowable motion.

For the two SCARA configurations, model the tool inertia around the vertical spindle as well as total carried mass. A broad multi-part gripper can satisfy the mass limit while exceeding permitted rotational inertia. Set the controller load and inertia parameters for empty and loaded states, then check insertion stroke and any allowable vertical pressing force separately. Nominal cycle figures do not establish performance at maximum payload.

Reach, orientation and fixture access

Build the same cell model for both candidates: base height, machine opening, fixture datum, maximum part size, tool extension and access for maintenance. ABB IRB 910SC 6 kg / 650 mm provides a stated 650 mm reference, while Mitsubishi Electric RH-3FHR3515-D provides 350 mm. Check the deepest production pose and the return path with the loaded tool. An arm that just touches the target at full extension may have little freedom left to turn, retract or avoid a door.

For SCARA assembly, check the full XY sweep, inner dead zone and Z stroke. A horizontal reach figure does not establish that the spindle can descend into the fixture without the tool body or cable loop colliding. Vertical pressing force is a separate limit from payload. Validate screwdriving or insertion forces, spindle inertia and settling with the real fixture. Neither robot gains six-axis pitch and roll freedom merely by having enough horizontal reach.

SCARA motion and assembly fit

The selected ABB IRB 910SC 6 kg / 650 mm and Mitsubishi Electric RH-3FHR3515-D should be assessed on the same horizontal transfer, vertical insertion and rotation sequence. Smaller horizontal reach can support a compact bench; larger reach can serve more nests, but also changes the swept area and cable clearance. Check actual Z stroke and tool length against the lowest station and tallest obstruction. Compare XY repeatability with XY repeatability, while keeping Z and rotational values in their own units.

Precision and throughput: compare the same task

The comparison uses ±0.015 mm for ABB IRB 910SC and ±0.01 mm (XY) for Mitsubishi Electric RH-3FHR. These figures should be read in their documented configuration scope. Repeatability is not absolute accuracy, camera calibration accuracy or finished-part capability. Fixture variation, TCP calibration, thermal conditions and tool compliance can dominate the error at the process point, especially when the tool extends far from the flange.

Ask each integrator to execute the same representative path with the same payload model, tool length, process dwell and stop conditions. Report transfer time, settling time, process time and waiting time separately. Published standard cycles often use different loads and distances; dividing one catalogue cycle by another would not establish the production advantage of ABB IRB 910SC over Mitsubishi Electric RH-3FHR. Use a measured or validated application cycle before assigning a throughput benefit.

Programming, controls and production integration

ABB IRB 910SC is paired here with ABB IRC5 Compact, while Mitsubishi Electric RH-3FHR uses Matched CR750/CR751 F-generation package; exact selected arm specification. Controller names identify the review baseline rather than a guarantee that all interface options are included. Compare the actual software revision, teaching workflow, diagnostic tools, fieldbus licences and recovery procedures. An existing trained team and reusable production code may outweigh a small dimensional advantage. Obtain a demonstration of the same machine handshake and interrupted-cycle recovery on both platforms.

Specify the PLC handshakes before ordering: cycle request, ready, busy, complete, fault, part present and recovery authorization. Define how an interrupted operation resumes without repeating a dangerous or quality-critical action. Vision, force sensing, fieldbus communication and external-axis coordination must be checked as explicit included or optional functions. An Ethernet connector does not by itself prove that a particular industrial protocol or software interface is licensed and supported.

Configuration and communication detail

Protection, installation and maintenance

Match the precise protection package to the process. Standard, protected, cleanroom, foundry and washing configurations can have different seals, services and maintenance requirements. Do not transfer the best optional IP or cleanroom rating to an unprotected base model. Check the controller location, cable bend radius, available lifting access and base reactions with the installer.

Treat safe operation as a property of the complete task and installation. Include the tool, sharp workpiece edges, trapping points, dropped loads and machine access. These robot systems require task-specific safeguarding; payload or compact size does not establish safe unguarded operation. Plan tool replacement and fault recovery without dismantling the whole installation, and include connector access, lubrication and spare-cable replacement in the maintenance layout.

Price and lifecycle value

Published arm list prices: ABB IRB 910SC is listed from $21,600. Request configuration-specific quotations for ABB IRB 910SC and Mitsubishi Electric RH-3FHR. An arm-only number is not the price of a commissioned production cell. Ask for separate line items for controller, pendant, communication options, end effector, safety equipment, installation, acceptance, training and warranty. Price changes, regional support and included software can reverse an apparent hardware-cost advantage. Compare the same delivered scope before calculating payback.

Compare the installed production scope: tool, fixtures, sensing, guarding, machine interface, programming, acceptance and training. For small-parts automation, include feeders, vision calibration, nests and rejected-part handling. Keep purchase cost and recurring support costs separate. No payback figure is defensible until the actual cycle, yield, utilization and installation quotation are known.

Selection and acceptance plan

Advance ABB IRB 910SC when 6 kg planar handling within the selected 650 mm SCARA envelope solves the real constraint and its selected configuration passes the load and access checks. Advance Mitsubishi Electric RH-3FHR when 3 kg planar handling within the selected 350 mm SCARA envelope provides the more suitable process arrangement. Reject either candidate if a mandatory pose, protection requirement or controller function cannot be demonstrated. A purchasing shortlist should preserve these conditions instead of converting a single catalogue advantage into a blanket recommendation.

Before acceptance, agree the representative parts, tool states, operating sequence and quality criteria with both suppliers. Demonstrate cold start, normal production, rejected parts, interrupted cycles and controlled recovery. Record the final tool data and software backup. This turns the comparison into a repeatable purchasing decision and helps prevent a later fixture change from invalidating the original robot selection.

Motion architecture and functionality

ABB IRB 910SC has 4 arm axes and Mitsubishi Electric RH-3FHR has 4 arm axes. A four-axis mechanism cannot independently supply every pitch and roll angle. Assess whether the tool must stay level or be presented at varying attitudes. Compare tool detection, sensing, machine I/O and recovery as separate delivered functions.

Industries and application fit

For ABB IRB 910SC vs Mitsubishi Electric RH-3FHR, use the actual part and process as the industry filter. Electronics assembly, component packaging and small mechanical assembly are plausible candidates when the required movement is primarily horizontal transfer plus vertical insertion. These are application-selection judgments, not claims that either exact model is installed at a named customer. A food, medical-device or clean-production application additionally requires the correct material, lubrication and protection package; the base model name does not establish hygienic or cleanroom compliance.

Frequently asked questions

Which robot is better for this application?

ABB IRB 910SC is the stronger starting point for 6 kg planar handling within the selected 650 mm SCARA envelope, while Mitsubishi Electric RH-3FHR is worth shortlisting for 3 kg planar handling within the selected 350 mm SCARA envelope. The final choice depends on the real loaded path, required protection, controls and acceptance results. Neither a higher payload nor a longer reach establishes a universal winner.

What payload should I use for the comparison?

Use 6 kg for the specified ABB IRB 910SC 6 kg / 650 mm example and 3 kg for Mitsubishi Electric RH-3FHR3515-D, subject to all documented load and orientation conditions. Include the tool, adapters, sensors and carried part. Four axes do not provide arbitrary wrist pitch and roll.

Does the stated reach guarantee access to my fixture?

No. The comparison gives 650 mm for ABB IRB 910SC and 350 mm for Mitsubishi Electric RH-3FHR using the stated model references. Joint limits, reach reference points, wrist orientation, tool length and collisions determine whether the actual fixture is accessible. Simulate the full approach and exit path.

Can I use the best specifications from every family variant?

No. The ABB family has distinct payload/reach combinations; this comparison uses ABB IRB 910SC 6 kg / 650 mm as a worked example. Match the order code, repeatability and protection package before purchasing. Do not combine one version’s maximum payload with another version’s maximum reach.

Is repeatability the same as finished-part accuracy?

No. The stated values are ±0.015 mm for ABB IRB 910SC scope and ±0.01 mm (XY) for the competitor scope. Finished-part results also depend on fixtures, TCP calibration, sensing, thermal conditions and tool compliance. Validate the actual process instead of treating catalogue repeatability as a complete accuracy guarantee.

How should purchase prices be compared?

Use current written quotations for ABB IRB 910SC and Mitsubishi Electric RH-3FHR with the same arm, controller, software, tooling and commissioning scope. This comparison does not represent an ATC sales offer or stock confirmation. Historical review figures are not a substitute for a configuration-specific purchase quotation.

Can these robots operate safely next to people without guarding?

These specifications do not establish a safe unguarded installation. Assess the complete task, tool, load and machine interface, then implement and validate the required safeguarding and operating procedures. Do not infer collaborative operation from a compact arm, limited payload or education setting.

What should an acceptance test compare?

Use the same parts, actual tool load, fixture locations, path and quality criteria for ABB IRB 910SC and Mitsubishi Electric RH-3FHR. Check production timing, settling, interruptions and recovery. Include the most difficult loaded approach and retreat. Approve the exact delivered configuration and preserve its final settings.

Related ATC reviews

Read the ABB IRB 910SC review

Read the Mitsubishi Electric RH-3FHR review

Specifications describe the model scope identified above. Purchase pricing requires a current configuration-specific quotation. Confirm current manufacturer documentation, local supply, controller compatibility and the exact configuration before purchase.