top of page

Mitsubishi Electric RH-10CRH vs Staubli TS2-100: Robot Comparison

5 days ago
12 min read

Updated: 3 hours ago

IN A NUTSHELL

🔎 THE KEY DIFFERENCE

This is a load-versus-reach trade-off: Mitsubishi Electric RH-10CRH 10 kg / 800 mm has the higher stated load capacity, while Staubli TS2-100 has the longer stated reach. Start with the constraint your task actually has.

→ CONSIDER Mitsubishi Electric RH-10CRH 10 kg / 800 mm

Consider it when additional load capacity matters more than extra reach. This article compares 10 kg and a 800 mm stated reach; include the gripper and part in the load.

→ CONSIDER Staubli TS2-100

Consider it when reaching farther matters more than the higher payload of the alternative. This article compares 8.4 kg and a 1,000 mm stated reach; include the gripper and part in the load.

💡 THE TAKEAWAY

For repetitive pick-and-place or assembly, check the actual vertical stroke and tool rotation as well as horizontal reach. Compare the same loaded cycle and installed quotation before deciding.

Mitsubishi Electric MELFA SCARA-family illustration; Mitsubishi Electric RH-10CRH selected geometry is identified in the comparison

Mitsubishi Electric RH-10CRH vs Staubli TS2-100 is a choice about SCARA assembly and planar handling. Mitsubishi Electric RH-10CRH 10 kg / 800 mm and Staubli TS2-100 differ in their working envelope, loading assumptions and engineering ecosystem. A useful decision starts with the exact mechanism and process, then checks whether either robot can execute the required path with the real tool attached. This comparison separates documented specifications from application-level engineering judgments.

 

Mitsubishi Electric RH-10CRH vs Staubli TS2-100: quick verdict

 

Shortlist Mitsubishi Electric RH-10CRH for 10 kg planar handling within the selected 800 mm SCARA envelope. Shortlist Staubli TS2-100 for 8.4 kg planar handling within the selected 1000 mm SCARA envelope. Both are four-axis SCARA candidates, so the decisive questions are planar access, vertical stroke, spindle inertia and the complete assembly cycle. Neither supplies independent tool pitch and roll.

 

The numerical comparison below uses Mitsubishi Electric RH-10CRH 10 kg / 800 mm against Staubli TS2-100. The Mitsubishi Electric configuration is a worked example chosen from documented family combinations, not a claim that every family member has those specifications. Other variants can change the conclusion. Published repeatability describes return to a taught position under specified conditions; it does not establish complete-cell accuracy or prove a faster production cycle.

 

Specifications and exact configuration scope


Criterion

Mitsubishi Electric RH-10CRH

Staubli TS2-100

Comparison configuration

Mitsubishi Electric RH-10CRH 10 kg / 800 mm

Staubli TS2-100

Payload used for comparison

10 kg

8.4 kg

Reach / motion-area reference

800 mm (selected configuration)

1000 mm

Axes

4

4

Repeatability for this scope

Confirm exact variant; family ±0.02 to ±0.025 mm (X-Y)

±0.02 mm

Controller reference

CR800-C2HD

CS9 SE or CS9 LP

Purchase-price basis

Configuration-specific quotation

Configuration-specific quotation

Purchase pricing

From $23,000 (arm list price)

From $31,000 (arm list price)


Read the reach row together with the geometric notes below. Manufacturers may specify an arm-link sum, a wrist-centre motion area or reach to the flange; those dimensions are not interchangeable. The table does not establish access to every point at every tool angle. Controller references identify reviewed packages, and actual compatibility must be confirmed by model, software version and region.

 

Mitsubishi Electric RH-10CRH: design and configuration

 

The Mitsubishi Electric MELFA RH-10CRH is a 4-axis SCARA robot with a 10 kg maximum payload, arm lengths of 600, 700 or 800 mm and X-Y repeatability of ±0.02 to ±0.025 mm. It is a lightweight, compact horizontal arm for high-speed pick-and-place, assembly and packaging, reaching composite speeds of 9,100 to 10,570 mm/s. Its motors are batteryless. The arm weighs 20 to 21 kg, mounts on the floor and runs on the CR800-C2HD controller. This review covers a SCARA family with multiple arm lengths. The comparison identifies one worked arm-length example separately; horizontal repeatability, vertical stroke, spindle rotation and load inertia require their own checks. A CR-series controller suffix identifies a specific integration architecture, rather than interchangeable electronics.


Mitsubishi Electric documented configuration

Payload / reach

Repeatability scope

Mitsubishi Electric RH-10CRH 10/0.6

10 kg / 600 mm

Confirm exact variant; family range is not a per-variant assignment

Mitsubishi Electric RH-10CRH 10/0.7

10 kg / 700 mm

Confirm exact variant; family range is not a per-variant assignment

Mitsubishi Electric RH-10CRH 10/0.8

10 kg / 800 mm

Confirm exact variant; family range is not a per-variant assignment


The selected example is Mitsubishi Electric RH-10CRH 10 kg / 800 mm. Standard and internally dressed versions must not be blended into one specification. Obtain a load diagram and current technical sheet for the actual order code, including any reduced payload or different protection package. A family starting price is not a quotation for the chosen variant.

 

Staubli TS2 SCARA-family illustration; Staubli TS2-100 configuration is assessed separately

Staubli TS2-100: design and configuration

 

The Stäubli TS2-100 is a 4-axis SCARA robot with a maximum payload of 8.4 kg, a reach of 1000 mm and a repeatability of ±0.02 mm. It has the longest reach in the TS2 range and is used for large-area pick and place, high-speed assembly and packaging lines. The Z stroke is 200 mm, with 400 mm as an option, and the cycle time is 0.35 s (170 cycles per minute) with a 2 kg load. It can be mounted on the floor or ceiling, is protected up to IP65 and runs on the Stäubli CS9 SE or CS9 LP controller.

 

For this pair, Staubli TS2-100 offers 8.4 kg over the stated 1000 mm reference, compared with 10 kg and 800 mm for Mitsubishi Electric RH-10CRH example. Staubli TS2-100 has the larger stated distance by 200 mm, but this difference is only a preliminary layout indicator because reference points and joint envelopes can differ. Locate the actual fixture in each manufacturer model before treating this as usable extra working space.

 

Payload, tooling and a worked load example

 

Consider an illustrative total wrist load of 6.72 kg: a 1.68 kg tool and adapter package carrying a 5.04 kg part or product group. This arithmetic leaves 3.28 kg below the Mitsubishi Electric RH-10CRH example’s nominal limit and 1.68 kg below Staubli TS2-100’s nominal limit. These are mass differences, not safety factors or a validated load approval. A heavy camera, valve block or retained material must be included before recalculating the total.

 

The example exposes the practical question: is the application limited by mass, by tool offset or by wrist rotation? Staubli TS2-100 is the lower-or-equal nominal payload choice in this pair. Mitsubishi Electric RH-10CRH offers more or equal headline mass capacity, but that alone cannot approve an eccentric fixture. Moving the same mass farther from the flange increases the moment, and spreading it increases rotational inertia. Manufacturer load diagrams and the actual centre of gravity govern the final allowable motion.

 

For the two SCARA configurations, model the tool inertia around the vertical spindle as well as total carried mass. A broad multi-part gripper can satisfy the mass limit while exceeding permitted rotational inertia. Set the controller load and inertia parameters for empty and loaded states, then check insertion stroke and any allowable vertical pressing force separately. Nominal cycle figures do not establish performance at maximum payload.

 

Reach, orientation and fixture access

 

Build the same cell model for both candidates: base height, machine opening, fixture datum, maximum part size, tool extension and access for maintenance. Mitsubishi Electric RH-10CRH 10 kg / 800 mm provides a stated 800 mm reference, while Staubli TS2-100 provides 1000 mm. Check the deepest production pose and the return path with the loaded tool. An arm that just touches the target at full extension may have little freedom left to turn, retract or avoid a door.

 

For SCARA assembly, check the full XY sweep, inner dead zone and Z stroke. A horizontal reach figure does not establish that the spindle can descend into the fixture without the tool body or cable loop colliding. Vertical pressing force is a separate limit from payload. Validate screwdriving or insertion forces, spindle inertia and settling with the real fixture. Neither robot gains six-axis pitch and roll freedom merely by having enough horizontal reach.

 

SCARA motion and assembly fit

 

The selected Mitsubishi Electric RH-10CRH 10 kg / 800 mm and Staubli TS2-100 should be assessed on the same horizontal transfer, vertical insertion and rotation sequence. Smaller horizontal reach can support a compact bench; larger reach can serve more nests, but also changes the swept area and cable clearance. Check actual Z stroke and tool length against the lowest station and tallest obstruction. Compare XY repeatability with XY repeatability, while keeping Z and rotational values in their own units.


SCARA requirement

Mitsubishi Electric RH-10CRH

Staubli TS2-100

Horizontal scope

800 mm selected example

1000 mm selected example

Payload scope

10 kg maximum for the named configuration

8.4 kg maximum for the named configuration

Z stroke and downforce

Confirm exact spindle and stroke option

Confirm exact spindle and stroke option

Tool pitch and roll

No independent six-axis pitch/roll

No independent six-axis pitch/roll

Acceptance path

Same transfer, insert, rotate and settle sequence

Same transfer, insert, rotate and settle sequence


Precision and throughput: compare the same task

 

The comparison uses Confirm exact variant; family ±0.02 to ±0.025 mm (X-Y) for Mitsubishi Electric RH-10CRH and ±0.02 mm for Staubli TS2-100. These figures should be read in their documented configuration scope. Repeatability is not absolute accuracy, camera calibration accuracy or finished-part capability. Fixture variation, TCP calibration, thermal conditions and tool compliance can dominate the error at the process point, especially when the tool extends far from the flange.

 

Ask each integrator to execute the same representative path with the same payload model, tool length, process dwell and stop conditions. Report transfer time, settling time, process time and waiting time separately. Published standard cycles often use different loads and distances; dividing one catalogue cycle by another would not establish the production advantage of Mitsubishi Electric RH-10CRH over Staubli TS2-100. Use a measured or validated application cycle before assigning a throughput benefit.

 

Programming, controls and production integration

 

Mitsubishi Electric RH-10CRH is paired here with CR800-C2HD, while Staubli TS2-100 uses CS9 SE or CS9 LP. Controller names identify the review baseline rather than a guarantee that all interface options are included. Compare the actual software revision, teaching workflow, diagnostic tools, fieldbus licences and recovery procedures. An existing trained team and reusable production code may outweigh a small dimensional advantage. Obtain a demonstration of the same machine handshake and interrupted-cycle recovery on both platforms.

 

Specify the PLC handshakes before ordering: cycle request, ready, busy, complete, fault, part present and recovery authorization. Define how an interrupted operation resumes without repeating a dangerous or quality-critical action. Vision, force sensing, fieldbus communication and external-axis coordination must be checked as explicit included or optional functions. An Ethernet connector does not by itself prove that a particular industrial protocol or software interface is licensed and supported.

 

Configuration and communication detail


Integration reference

Mitsubishi Electric RH-10CRH

Staubli TS2-100

Control package

CR800-C2HD

CS9 SE or CS9 LP

Documented interface baseline

Ethernet, CC-Link, CC-Link IE, PROFINET, EtherNet/IP, EtherCAT, PROFIBUS, DeviceNet, 32 inputs, 32 outputs

EtherCAT, EtherCAT FSoE, EtherNet/IP, PROFINET, Sercos III, POWERLINK, Modbus, 2 Ethernet ports, 1 EtherCAT port, 2 real-time Ethernet ports, RS-232 serial link, 2 USB ports, fast I/O

Programming baseline

Named platform software and supported API; confirm supplied version

Named platform software and supported API; confirm supplied version

Integration acceptance

Test the actual machine handshake and controlled recovery

Test the same handshake and controlled recovery


Protection, installation and maintenance

 

Match the precise protection package to the process. Standard, protected, cleanroom, foundry and washing configurations can have different seals, services and maintenance requirements. Do not transfer the best optional IP or cleanroom rating to an unprotected base model. Check the controller location, cable bend radius, available lifting access and base reactions with the installer.

 

Treat safe operation as a property of the complete task and installation. Include the tool, sharp workpiece edges, trapping points, dropped loads and machine access. These robot systems require task-specific safeguarding; payload or compact size does not establish safe unguarded operation. Plan tool replacement and fault recovery without dismantling the whole installation, and include connector access, lubrication and spare-cable replacement in the maintenance layout.

 

Price and lifecycle value

 

Published arm list prices: Mitsubishi Electric RH-10CRH is listed from $23,000 and Staubli TS2-100 is listed from $31,000. Request configuration-specific quotations for Mitsubishi Electric RH-10CRH and Staubli TS2-100. An arm-only number is not the price of a commissioned production cell. Ask for separate line items for controller, pendant, communication options, end effector, safety equipment, installation, acceptance, training and warranty. Price changes, regional support and included software can reverse an apparent hardware-cost advantage. Compare the same delivered scope before calculating payback.

 

Compare the installed production scope: tool, fixtures, sensing, guarding, machine interface, programming, acceptance and training. For small-parts automation, include feeders, vision calibration, nests and rejected-part handling. Keep purchase cost and recurring support costs separate. No payback figure is defensible until the actual cycle, yield, utilization and installation quotation are known.

 

Selection and acceptance plan


Decision gate

Mitsubishi Electric RH-10CRH

Staubli TS2-100

Strongest documented fit

10 kg planar handling within the selected 800 mm SCARA envelope

8.4 kg planar handling within the selected 1000 mm SCARA envelope

Main boundary

Family maxima belong to different variants; the selected example needs a matched quotation.

Four axes do not provide arbitrary wrist pitch and roll.

Required approval

Exact Mitsubishi Electric variant, tool load and validated process path

Exact competitor revision, tool load and validated process path

Acceptance evidence

Agreed parts, path, quality and recovery results

The same agreed parts, path, quality and recovery results


Advance Mitsubishi Electric RH-10CRH when 10 kg planar handling within the selected 800 mm SCARA envelope solves the real constraint and its selected configuration passes the load and access checks. Advance Staubli TS2-100 when 8.4 kg planar handling within the selected 1000 mm SCARA envelope provides the more suitable process arrangement. Reject either candidate if a mandatory pose, protection requirement or controller function cannot be demonstrated. A purchasing shortlist should preserve these conditions instead of converting a single catalogue advantage into a blanket recommendation.

 

Before acceptance, agree the representative parts, tool states, operating sequence and quality criteria with both suppliers. Demonstrate cold start, normal production, rejected parts, interrupted cycles and controlled recovery. Record the final tool data and software backup. This turns the comparison into a repeatable purchasing decision and helps prevent a later fixture change from invalidating the original robot selection.

 

Motion architecture and functionality

 

Mitsubishi Electric RH-10CRH has 4 arm axes and Staubli TS2-100 has 4 arm axes. A four-axis mechanism cannot independently supply every pitch and roll angle. Assess whether the tool must stay level or be presented at varying attitudes. Compare tool detection, sensing, machine I/O and recovery as separate delivered functions.

 

Industries and application fit

 

For Mitsubishi Electric RH-10CRH vs Staubli TS2-100, use the actual part and process as the industry filter. Electronics assembly, component packaging and small mechanical assembly are plausible candidates when the required movement is primarily horizontal transfer plus vertical insertion. These are application-selection judgments, not claims that either exact model is installed at a named customer. A food, medical-device or clean-production application additionally requires the correct material, lubrication and protection package; the base model name does not establish hygienic or cleanroom compliance.


Selection issue

Mitsubishi Electric RH-10CRH

Staubli TS2-100

Tool and workpiece mass

10 kg named scope; include the complete tool

8.4 kg named scope; include the complete tool

Working reference

800 mm (selected configuration)

1000 mm

Main configuration boundary

Family maxima belong to different variants; the selected example needs a matched quotation.

Four axes do not provide arbitrary wrist pitch and roll.

Process approval

Demonstrate the actual loaded path and recovery

Demonstrate the same loaded path and recovery


Frequently asked questions


Which robot is better for this application?

 

Mitsubishi Electric RH-10CRH is the stronger starting point for 10 kg planar handling within the selected 800 mm SCARA envelope, while Staubli TS2-100 is worth shortlisting for 8.4 kg planar handling within the selected 1000 mm SCARA envelope. The final choice depends on the real loaded path, required protection, controls and acceptance results. Neither a higher payload nor a longer reach establishes a universal winner.

 

What payload should I use for the comparison?

 

Use 10 kg for the specified Mitsubishi Electric RH-10CRH 10 kg / 800 mm example and 8.4 kg for Staubli TS2-100, subject to all documented load and orientation conditions. Include the tool, adapters, sensors and carried part. Four axes do not provide arbitrary wrist pitch and roll.

 

Does the stated reach guarantee access to my fixture?

 

No. The comparison gives 800 mm for Mitsubishi Electric RH-10CRH and 1000 mm for Staubli TS2-100 using the stated model references. Joint limits, reach reference points, wrist orientation, tool length and collisions determine whether the actual fixture is accessible. Simulate the full approach and exit path.

 

Can I use the best specifications from every family variant?

 

No. The Mitsubishi Electric family has distinct payload/reach combinations; this comparison uses Mitsubishi Electric RH-10CRH 10 kg / 800 mm as a worked example. Match the order code, repeatability and protection package before purchasing. Do not combine one version’s maximum payload with another version’s maximum reach.

 

Is repeatability the same as finished-part accuracy?

 

No. The stated values are Confirm exact variant; family ±0.02 to ±0.025 mm (X-Y) for Mitsubishi Electric RH-10CRH scope and ±0.02 mm for the competitor scope. Finished-part results also depend on fixtures, TCP calibration, sensing, thermal conditions and tool compliance. Validate the actual process instead of treating catalogue repeatability as a complete accuracy guarantee.

 

How should purchase prices be compared?

 

Use current written quotations for Mitsubishi Electric RH-10CRH and Staubli TS2-100 with the same arm, controller, software, tooling and commissioning scope. This comparison does not represent an ATC sales offer or stock confirmation. Historical review figures are not a substitute for a configuration-specific purchase quotation.

 

Can these robots operate safely next to people without guarding?

 

These specifications do not establish a safe unguarded installation. Assess the complete task, tool, load and machine interface, then implement and validate the required safeguarding and operating procedures. Do not infer collaborative operation from a compact arm, limited payload or education setting.

 

What should an acceptance test compare?

 

Use the same parts, actual tool load, fixture locations, path and quality criteria for Mitsubishi Electric RH-10CRH and Staubli TS2-100. Check production timing, settling, interruptions and recovery. Include the most difficult loaded approach and retreat. Approve the exact delivered configuration and preserve its final settings.

 

Related ATC reviews

 

 

 

Specifications describe the model scope identified above. Purchase pricing requires a current configuration-specific quotation. Confirm current manufacturer documentation, local supply, controller compatibility and the exact configuration before purchase.

FAIRINO ROBOTIC ARM_edited_edited_edited_edited.png
All Things Cobots

Free Consultation

ROBOTIC ARMS
All Things Cobots

© All Things Cobots Proudly created By G2T

bottom of page