Applied Motion SWM24IP-3DE and TXM24IP-1DG EtherNet/IP Motors Review: Specs, Price and Applications
Updated: 4 days ago
SWM24IP-3DE and TXM24IP-1DG put dual-port EtherNet/IP connections on NEMA 24 integrated motors. The former is an integrated stepper with encoder-supported stall functions; the latter uses StepSERVO closed-loop control. Their similar network and enclosure format should not obscure this control-architecture difference.
Quick Verdict
A useful comparison for machine builders distributing EtherNet/IP axes along a mechanism. Choose on the required motor behavior and controller integration as well as cabling. Dual ports can shorten a line topology, but do not automatically provide a redundant network or interchangeable axis behavior.
Applied Motion SWM24IP-3DE and TXM24IP-1DG EtherNet/IP Motors at a Glance
Specification | Details |
Products | SWM24IP-3DE integrated stepper / TXM24IP-1DG StepSERVO |
Network | Dual-port EtherNet/IP |
Connection format | Two M12 network connections in the manufacturer submission |
Frame | NEMA 24; cited 60 mm mounting flange |
Environment | IP65 stated for both cited configurations |
Feedback / control | Both include encoder; TXM uses StepSERVO closed-loop technology |
Naming qualification | Use TXM24IP-1DG; original source heading contains an inconsistent IDG spelling |
Price | Request a quote for exact motor, cables and network/control requirements |
Design and Engineering Assessment
A line network can reduce long home-run cables and central switch ports. The tradeoff is dependence on the actual intervening devices and cables. Establish the effect of disconnecting one axis and verify the network recovery required by the machine.
The original submission cites Ethernet speeds up to 100 Mbit/s. Link rate is not the update period or axis settling time. PLC task timing, messaging or cyclic I/O configuration and motion execution determine actual response.
Both products contain an encoder, but the SWM stall-detection/prevention behavior differs from the TXM StepSERVO architecture. Assess the actual following behavior and fault reporting under load rather than assuming the same control loop from the shared connector layout.
Choose the Motion Architecture
Use the SWM or TXM part number to define the actual control strategy. Compare the required acceleration, disturbance response and acceptable fault behavior with the selected motor data.
Confirm shaft and mounting dimensions. The source relates NEMA 24 mounting to NEMA 23 while noting a larger shaft; matching bolt locations alone does not prove coupling compatibility.
Network and Environment
Document topology, addressing, PLC integration and the expected startup sequence. Two ports support cabling choices; redundancy requires a specifically supported protocol and configuration.
Maintain the intended IP65 scope with the complete installed connections. Test the axis and network together during fault recovery and replacement, not only under an ideal steady run.
Applications and Selection
EtherNet/IP conveyor and OEM positioning systems using distributed IP65 motor/drive units.
For Applied Motion SWM24IP-3DE and TXM24IP-1DG EtherNet/IP Motors, define the actual machine duty before selecting an ordering configuration. Include the required operating point, available installation space, environment and control interfaces. The specification table describes the product or family; the surrounding machine determines which of those features matters for the intended job.
Price and Value
Price: Request a quote for the exact configuration. Compare the product, compatible control equipment, required mechanical parts, cabling and commissioning as one installed system. A component price alone does not represent the cost of a working automation axis.
Evaluate an alternative against the same duty and acceptance criteria. Match the continuous operating requirement first, then compare transient capability, feedback, mechanical fit and support. This avoids choosing between superficially similar products whose ratings describe different operating conditions.
Pros and Cons
Advantages
Dual ports support compact distributed cabling
Both cited assemblies offer IP65 and encoder integration
Clear choice between conventional integrated-stepper and StepSERVO architectures
Limitations
Dual ports do not automatically establish redundancy
Shared format does not make the control behavior identical
Link speed does not define axis response time
Who Should Consider Applied Motion SWM24IP-3DE and TXM24IP-1DG EtherNet/IP Motors?
Consider Applied Motion SWM24IP-3DE and TXM24IP-1DG EtherNet/IP Motors for etherNet/IP conveyor and OEM positioning systems using distributed IP65 motor/drive units. Establish the required operating point and installation interfaces before choosing the configuration, and use a representative loaded cycle as the acceptance basis.
Applied Motion SWM24IP-3DE and TXM24IP-1DG EtherNet/IP Motors FAQ
Which two products are compared?
SWM24IP-3DE and TXM24IP-1DG, using the documented TXM part spelling.
Are they both StepSERVO?
No. TXM is the StepSERVO configuration; SWM is the integrated-stepper design with documented stall functions.
What do two Ethernet ports provide?
They support appropriate line/daisy-chain cabling and related topology choices.
Do two ports guarantee redundancy?
No. Verify actual supported network functions and configuration.
Does 100 Mbit/s specify motion cycle time?
No. It is a link-rate statement, not an axis response guarantee.
Can the same coupling always be reused?
No. Confirm the actual shaft dimensions as well as the mounting pattern.
Does IP65 cover every cleaning process?
No. Assess the actual environmental and cleaning requirements separately.
What should the PLC acceptance test include?
Axis command and status handling, loaded motion, communication loss, startup and replacement recovery.
Prices are indicative and may change. Confirm the final configuration, commercial terms and delivery schedule before ordering.
